The Johnny Depp, Amber Heard Trial Verdict is In: What to Know

In a split verdict, the jury awards Depp $15 million and Heard $2 million.

Heard and Depp in the courtroom on May 16.
Steve Helber/Getty Images

A jury on Wednesday found both Johnny Depp and Amber Heard liable for defamation but awarded more money to Depp. The decision follows a highly publicized trial that took place in Fairfax, Virginia, and spanned several weeks.

Depp sued ex-wife Heard for defamation over a 2018 op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post, seeking $50 million in damages. On Wednesday, a jury found Depp had been defamed by Heard in the piece and awarded him $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. A judge reduced the punitive damages to $350,000, which is the cap in Virginia.

Heard, who was seeking $100 million in a countersuit, was awarded $2 million in compensatory damages and no punitive damages. The jury found that a statement made by a former lawyer of Depp’s — one of the three statements included in Heard’s countersuit — had been defamatory.

Here’s what else you should know about the trial.

Why did Johnny Depp sue Amber Heard?

Heard, 36, is a model and actress who starred in 2018’s Aquaman. She was married to Depp, 58, from 2015 to 2016. The pair divorced in August 2016.

In December 2018, Heard wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post titled, “I spoke up against sexual violence — and faced our culture’s wrath. That has to change.” She said in the article that she’d become “a public figure representing domestic abuse” but didn’t mention Depp’s name.

Depp alleged Heard defamed him in the op-ed. During opening statements, Depp lawyer Benjamin Chew said Heard’s article clearly referred to Depp, and that Heard’s “false allegations had a significant impact on Mr. Depp’s family and his ability to work in the profession he loved.”

Benjamin Rottenborn, a lawyer for Heard, said that the First Amendment protects what she wrote. “The article isn’t about Johnny Depp,” Rottenborn said. “The article is about the social change for which she is advocating and that the First Amendment protects.”

Rottenborn also said evidence in the trial would show that Heard did suffer domestic abuse at the hands of Depp, and that it was physical, emotional, verbal and psychological.

Depp was faced with proving that Heard knowingly made false claims. Heard filed a countersuit against Depp, which was decided as part of the trial. She alleged that Depp defamed her when his former lawyer referred to her allegations of abuse as a hoax.

Johnny Depp on the stand during the trial. As he talks, he holds out his right hand, with fingers spread, as if emphasizing a point.
Depp testifies.Evelyn Hockstein/Getty Images

Depp lost a defamation case that involved Heard in 2020. He’d sued British tabloid The Sun over a headline calling him a “wife beater.” Depp filed his current defamation suit in 2019, the year after she wrote the op-ed.

What did Heard and Depp say during testimony in the trial?

When asked about the first time Depp allegedly hit her, Heard described an instance when she’d asked Depp about what one of his tattoos said, and he’d replied “wino.” “I just laughed because I thought he was joking, and he slapped me across the face,” she said. Heard also testified that Depp sexually assaulted her shortly after they were married.

During his testimony earlier in the trial, Depp said that he never struck Heard but that she displayed violence during their relationship. Depp alleged she threw a vodka bottle at his hand during an argument, cutting off a part of his middle finger.

Heard’s and Depp’s teams delivered their closing arguments on May 27.

Why the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial Dominated the Internet

What’s happening

Social media is flooded with videos from the domestic abuse and defamation trial between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, whose marriage fell apart in 2016.

Why it matters

People on TikTok and YouTube have turned this case into one of the most popular topics on the internet.

What’s next

While views and comments climb, critics say the internet pile-on may lead people to take abuse allegations less seriously.

Marc Musso has a habit of writing a silly song about whatever he’s doing. Sometimes it’s about feeding his cat Malmo, other times it’s about playing board games.

So it’s probably no surprise that as the 27-year-old Texan was watching a live feed of the defamation trial between the blockbuster actor Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, Depp’s movie star ex-wife, he found himself writing a song.

Sung from the perspective of Heard’s lawyers, Musso’s song pokes fun at how often they raised objections to Depp’s comments while on the stand.

“I used to be respected. People took me at my word,” he starts singing with pop-music beats in the background. “Then I became a lawyer representing Amber Heard.”

Indeed, the weeks-long drama that is the trial between two of Hollywood’s biggest stars has somehow become one of the most popular topics on the internet. In between images of the ongoing Russian attack on Ukraine, the mass shooting in Buffalo, New York, the national abortion debate sparking protests around the US, and rising inflation, it’s video snippets coming from the same static, dark wood-paneled courtroom that are going viral.

The case began as a reaction to an opinion story Heard published in 2018 in The Washington Post amid the #MeToo movement against sexual harassment, discrimination and assault. Her piece, which discussed domestic abuse she’d experienced, did not name Depp by name. Depp sued her in 2019, alleging Heard defamed him and that she had been the abuser. The next year, Heard countersued Depp.

Now they’re in court, with a camera live feed streaming free to the internet from their proceedings in Fairfax County, Virginia, and millions of are tuning in. Some people are watching because it seems entertaining to them. Others are cheering on their preferred side. Before the trial’s concluding week, Saturday Night Live lampooned the case as a spectacle being put on “for fun.” In reaction, critics have said they’re disgusted by how callously audiences are treating the case.

All that doesn’t seem to have stopped people sharing links, watching videos by the millions and tumbling further down the rabbit hole, remixing trial footage into their own brand of parody.

That includes Musso, who didn’t initially plan to post his 87-second tune to the internet, until his girlfriend convinced him to put it on YouTube. And then on TikTok. Less than two weeks later, his song has racked up more than 15 million views.

Musso thought the trial “was ridiculous, and most people seem to agree,” he said. After all, to him it’s just one rich person suing another rich person while airing out their drama to the public.

Social media jury

Search for Depp or Heard on YouTube or TikTok, and most of what you’ll find are short clips from the trial with tabloid-worthy headlines like Johnny Depp Destroys Amber Heard’s Lawyer (13 million views) or one drawn from a now famous quote from Heard’s testimony, “I did not punch you, I was hitting you” (29 million views). The people who run these accounts say they’re uploading the clips, which run to several minutes in length, to draw attention to a detail they believe is important that might otherwise get overlooked.

Critics, meanwhile, worry it’s turned from mocking celebrities to encouraging harassment of abuse victims. That particularly became clear after Saturday Night Live lampooned the trial in a May 14 skit, reducing Depp’s and Heard’s arguments over domestic abuse to, as SNL said, “a news story we can all collectively watch and say, ‘Glad it ain’t me?'”

“Domestic violence is not a joke,” sex and culture critic Ella Dawson tweeted in a viral thread a few hours after the skit was aired. “In twenty years people are going to look back at this trial and all of the media coverage and be disgusted. Some of us are already disgusted.”

Despite the criticism, SNL’s video pulled in more than 4 million views in the first day after it was posted, more than any other video the show’s posted in the past month. By midday Monday, SNL’s post was the top trending video on YouTube. Other accounts across YouTube and TikTok have seen similar success, racking up views along with torrents of new followers. And some have made money off it too.

The creators seem to share the same story of growing interest in the trial over time. Eventually, they decide to post videos either because they’re longtime Depp fans from his days as Jack Sparrow in the multibillion dollar Pirates of the Caribbean movies, or perhaps his more recent run as the villain Gellert Grindelwald in the Harry Potter prequel series, Fantastic Beasts (a role he lost amid the controversy surrounding the couple’s split).

Haider Ali said he saw himself in Depp and Heard’s explosive marriage, which began in 2015 and ended after just over a year. Heard filed for divorce and obtained a temporary restraining order. Ali, a 27-year-old digital artist and web developer, said he’d been a victim of domestic violence and believed sharing clips from the trial on YouTube might help other people who’ve also been in that situation.

“I posted a few videos and they didn’t do so well, and I sat down and wondered, Why am I posting these videos?” Then his third video hit more than 2 million views. And a day later, another hit 2.6 million views. Within the week, his channel had shifted from his self-styled singer-songwriter roots, which saw him playing rock performances on his electric guitar, to several-minute-long videos from the trial.

Johnny Depp in a suit, removing his sunglasses.
Johnny Depp in a Virginia courtroom during his defamation trial against ex-wife Amber Heard.Getty Images

One of his most popular so far, with more than 2.6 million views, shows Depp and Heard on screen, overlaid with laughing emoji, and the title Witness Dr. Dawn Hughes Doesn’t Remember Anything.

Ali said he incorporates emoji with dramatic titles like Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Ben Chew Blasts Amber Heard because that’s the culture of the internet sites he grew up with, like Twitter, Tumblr and MySpace. “I’m trying to mask the negativity with fun stuff,” he said.

Alice Parkes took it a step further. She created animations to play over audio from the actual trial, lampooning everyone involved. Her most popular video so far portrays Heard doodling while Depp’s on the stand, until he accuses Heard or one of her friends of defecating in the couple’s bed, at which point she’s sweating and visibly uncomfortable.

“I was thinking, ‘the absurdity of the whole trial would just look so funny animated,'” Parkes said. The 28-year-old professional illustrator based in Wales had about 50 followers on her TikTok account, @pettyparrot, before her first video went viral with more than 12.7 million views. Three more hit videos later, she’s got about 108,000 followers and joined the TikTok Creator Fund that pays her for video views.

“I could do this and, you know, possibly make money off it, which would be nice,” she said.

Way past O.J.

Courtroom dramas have long been a pillar of American pop culture. TV shows like NBC’s Law & Order have been on the air longer than many popular TikTokers have been alive. Key moments in US history, like the Salem witch trials, are taught in school. The Watergate hearings on Capitol Hill ahead of President Richard Nixon’s resignation from office in 1974 changed American politics so much that nearly any major controversy winds up with a nickname that includes a “-gate” affixed to the end.

Over the past 30 years though, cable TV and, eventually, internet streaming have offered people a chance to watch every moment of a high-profile case. All the attention changes the way we look at these court proceedings as well. Often, the most-watched ones are called “trials of the century.”

“With big trials like this, you get these rare opportunities where practically everybody does at least have a little bit of a passing knowledge of what’s going on,” said Robert Thompson, founding director of the Bleier Center for Television and Popular Culture at Syracuse University.

Millions of people across the country were glued to their TVs watching football star O.J. Simpson’s murder trial in 1995, pop star Michael Jackson‘s molestation trial in 2005 or even the heartbreaking case surrounding the death of 2-year-old Caylee Anthony in 2011. And in each of the major cases often cited as pop culture phenomena, the drama from the courtroom became as much a topic of fascination as the circumstances of the case.

Though Depp v. Heard doesn’t have the same stakes as a criminal trial, or the political importance of a presidential impeachment, it does have a dramatic storyline filled with bizarre characters and salacious details.

And it has social media.

“With the O.J. trial, you could turn it off,” said Paul Booth, a professor of media at DePaul University in Chicago. “You could not watch it. You could not read the newspaper.”

But computer programs running our social feeds on Twitter, YouTube, Facebook and TikTok keep feeding Depp v. Heard to us because even if we’re not interested, our friends probably are.

And the rabbit holes social media creates can change our perspectives as well. The social feeds may start showing you only pro-Depp videos and posts, because that’s what the apps think you’ll want. And, Booth added, TikTok’s short-video format makes it even harder to find nuance beyond the good guy or villain narratives people often slot into.

“Where it becomes bad or where it becomes problematic,” he said, “is when you lose that kind of critical focus on it and you start thinking that the rabbit hole you’ve gone down is the whole world, and you lose perspective on everything else.”

The political-type online mudslinging between Depp fans and Heard defenders hasn’t just made it tough for an internet passerby to quickly understand what’s going on. It’s made the job for people like longtime trial consultant and psychologist Amy Singer harder too. She’s often brought in to consult on high stakes cases, including the Casey Anthony criminal trial and Michael Jackson’s civil trial.

Singer isn’t consulting for Depp or Heard, but she’s been watching. Singer’s team has a set of social media listening tools that deduce what jurors might be thinking by following social media posts of people with similar demographics and backgrounds. What she’s found isn’t the typical policy debate we hear during an emotional murder case, or the cultural conversations we usually have around child abuse during molestation trials.

Instead, Singer’s team is detecting the rifts between the two movie stars’ fandoms.

“It’s more like a political debate,” she said, referring to the trial as a “pig v. pig” case, where “who gives a damn who wins?”

If you aren’t being bombarded by Depp v. Heard videos, by the way, Singer’s social media listening tools indicate you’re probably older. While the court case is blowing up across YouTube and TikTok, where viewers tend to skew younger, the “adult population” she tracks on Facebook and Twitter are more worried with the Ukraine war and inflation. “They’re not talking about Amber Heard. ‘Amber who?'”

Amber Heard in the background of a courtroom, Johnny Depp in foreground.
Some online videos track the little moments when Johnny Depp and Amber Heard seem to interact in the courtroom.Getty Images

Making dollars

Lahiru Darsha started posting videos about Depp v. Heard when he felt like the trial wasn’t going the Pirates of the Caribbean star’s way. Soon, Darsha was posting short video snippets — less than 2 minutes — on his YouTube channel, Redux Dreams Lab.

Before the trial, the 25-year-old’s channel mostly had videos of his streaming gameplay from the hit crime drama game Grand Theft Auto. The game had helped him learn English, and the videos made him about $100 in ad revenue every few months while he was in school earning a cybersecurity degree.

But his Depp videos took off, garnering millions of views within days of being uploaded. The 35-second Johnny Depp’s Bodyguard Being Hilarious rang up 1.3 million views, Johnny Depp Trying to Resist Laughter, uploaded the same day, attracted nearly 4 million views. By the end of his first day uploading, he’d made $3,700.

“I wanted to draw attention to specific points that might be missed from the livestreams,” he said. And the thrill of finding an audience — most of whom were positive to him — inspired Darsha to upload even more clips.

He’s made more than $11,000 since the trial began, and plans to use the money either to help build a home in Sri Lanka, where he lives, or study abroad in Europe. He also intends to pay back family who’ve supported him through school.

Several days into May, Darsha noticed his YouTube earnings had dropped. He then heard rumors that YouTube moderators were penalizing accounts that post snippets from the trial, so decided to hide those videos. After this story’s publication, YouTube further reduced his earnings by several thousand dollars. YouTube didn’t respond to several requests for comment for this story.

Making sense

Amid the courtroom snippets pulled from the live feed, there are people on YouTube and TikTok dedicating their time to sober, serious analysis too.

DC-based lawyer Devin Stone, who heads the YouTube channel LegalEagle, posted a nearly 22-minute-long video breaking down the case and what led up to it. But he began his video by making fun of the flood of videos cheering on Depp and bashing Heard. “This latest suit and countersuit is already turning into a circus,” he said in his video, which has garnered more than 1.7 million views. “Determining the truth of domestic violence allegations is invariably a challenging prospect. As a result, the public’s response to these allegations has been incredibly polarizing.”

The emotion amped up during Depp’s and Heard’s competing testimonies on the stand, during which evidence in the form of recordings of personal interactions and text messages, which celebrities usually try to shield from the public, were brought into plain view.

The drama has given married lawyers Ashleigh Ruggles Stanley, 28, and Maclen Stanley, 31, a chance to bring some celebrity culture onto their TikTok account,

“When people think about the law, it sounds very boring, and not like an exciting TikTok you’d like to watch,” Ashleigh said. “So whenever there’s a tie-in to something that people are already interested in … people are excited to watch.”

They’ve also broken down courtroom tactics and reactions, drawing in more than 12.8 million views for their 59-second video explaining why Depp’s lawyer once made a celebratory fist pump when Heard said something seemingly innocuous on the stand.

“That’s a good foothold to step in and say, ‘Hey, you might have seen and even liked this viral video, but let’s talk about what’s actually happening,'” she added.

Musso, the musician from Texas, probably won’t be recording any more parody songs about the court proceedings though. He thinks his moment in the sun from the trial is probably worth three songs, and then that’ll be it.

Musso’s final offering, Johnny Depp’s Rap (The Final Trial Bop), attracted more than 195,000 views between TikTok and YouTube. One commenter pleaded, “This can’t be the last. We need a cross examination bop and a verdict bop.”

But Musso’s made his decision, he said. “I don’t want people to get too sick of it.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *